Brian J. Bruns aka Bruns from the AHBL, felony fox in the Internet-henhouse

BRIAN J. BRUNS (AHBL)
BRIAN J. BRUNS, owner/webmaster of the abusive ABHL website, is aCONVICTED FELON (Felon Indictment # I-1577-02,S-2423-02 and SAPDPolice Report # 05071019). And the fox wants to be in charge of the henhouse (Internet). Bruns actually HACKED the computers of his former employer, Pat Prague at AccessHighway (http://accesshighway.com/). He was many months incarcerated and has an FBI file.

COMMACK MAN INDICTED FOR HACKINGhttp://www.co.suffolk.ny.us/da/press/2002/06_26_02.htm

ABOUT BRIAN J. BRUNS AND HIS FRIEND ANDREW D. KIRCH
They are two young men, who think they own the internet and who don't know the laws or the U.S. Constitution.
Brian J. Bruns, a felon and jail bird, scribbles on the SOSDG org and the AHBL org, the alleged "abusive hosts blocking list." He is an abuser, an enemy of the U.S. Constitution (anti-free speech), a spammer, and a defamer himself.

His friend Andrew D. Kirch of D&K Consulting and Trelane, has made mafia threats against Barbara Schwarz:
On April 29, 2005, Andrew D. Kirch posted on usenet (Google groups)under subject line "Updated" followed by threats against her, which puts him on the same level with mafiosos.
"Define shenanigans, I have some friends with the ability to cause her [Barbara Schwarz] quite a bit of grief. Their methods aren'ttoo kosher and I don't ask too many questions, are we talking latenight scheduled pizza delivery or 20 refridgerators (sic)overnighted to her front porch, with limo service for 50?"

Bruns defames anybody as "abuser" who he, for irrational reasons, doesn't like, and he makes the alleged abuse up, as in my case.

Bruns has nothing to do with religion Scientology, but in spring of the year 2005, he mailed at least 53 false reports about any posting Barbara Schwarz made on a Scientology related newsgroup, despite the fact that he didn't understand the content of her postings. He attempted to force her ISP/library to deny Internet access to her and he threatened to blacklist them. I consider this blackmail by Bruns, a convicted felon, who thinks he owns the Internet and acts as if he is the planetary internet police chief. He is completely unqualified to judge what postings on a Scientology related newsgroup are off topic or spam, as he never was a member of that religion nor does he has a clue about her religion. He probably is uneducated about any religion and certainly uneducated about human rights, the U.S. Constitution, and freedom of speech.

Barbara is not the only one being abused by Bruns and the AHBL or SOSDG.Rick Scoville, the CEO of the Free Speech Store (FSS), was granted are straining order on Bruns and Kirch for attacks against the FSS website.
Rick Scoville (Free Speech Store / FSS)

Mr. Scoville informed that he was advised by the police that Bruns and his friends may be in violation of the Rico Act and that the Probation Office in New Jersey is working on revoking Brun's probation. Mr. Scoville also informed that he is preparing a FEDERAL LAW SUIT against Brian J. Bruns, and his friends, for repeatedly hacking FSS and trying to destroy his business.

A state law suit is pending against Bruns and Kirch. Instead of respecting laws and other people's rights, Bruns lowered himself even more by begging on the internet for money to pay his legal bills.
Original Petition and Application for Temporary Restraining Order andPreliminary and Permanent Injunction, FSS v. Brian J. Bruns andAndrew D. Kirch:
http://www.thunderstar.net/~Schwarz/extremists/bruns/pdf/FSS_Original_Petition.pdf
Exhibits to the Original Petition and Application for Restraining Order,FSS v. Brian J. Bruns and Andrew D. Kirch:
http://www.thunderstar.net/~Schwarz/extremists/bruns/pdf/FSS_Exhibits_Original_Restraining_Order_FSS_vs_Bruns_and_Kirch_1.pdfhttp://www.thunderstar.net/~Schwarz/extremists/bruns/pdf/FSS_Exhibits_Original_Restraining_Order_FSS_vs_Bruns_and_Kirch_2.pdf
Witness Subpoenas, FSS v. Brian J. Bruns and Andrew D. Kirch:
http://www.thunderstar.net/~Schwarz/extremists/bruns/pdf/FSS_Witness_Subpoenas_FSS_vs_Bruns_and_Kirch_2.pdf
Temporary Restraining Order, FSS v. Brian J. Bruns and Andrew D. Kirch:
http://www.thunderstar.net/~Schwarz/extremists/bruns/pdf/FSS_Temporary_Restraining_Order_FSS_vs_Bruns_and_Kirch.pdf
Extended Restraining Order, FSS v. Brian J. Bruns and Andrew D. Kirch:
http://www.thunderstar.net/~Schwarz/extremists/bruns/pdf/FSS_Extended_Restraining_Order_FSS_vs_Bruns_and_Kirch.pdf
The FSS describes exactly what Bruns and his friends are and what theyare up to:

"BRUNS is an ex-convict and convicted felon for which he served five (5) months in jail in Suffolk County, New York for First Degree Computer Tampering. The Indictment numbers are I-1577-02 and S-2423-02. Per a plea bargain with the District Attorney, Indictment I-1577-02 was dismissed in lieu of Indictment S-2423-02.Within a short period after his release he began a blocklist ofISPs and called it The Abusive Hosts Blocking List (AHBL.org). Supposedly, this is a list of Internet spammers, but BRUNS uses this list as his own personal, vindictive blocking list for those whom he simply does not like or disagrees with on ANY issue and adds people simply to get even with them for what he deems being problematic. Having BRUNS, a convicted felon, in charge of such a list is analogous to having a convicted felon as Police Chief.

"BRUNS has been stalking and harassing FSS since late 2003 by contacting each and every ISP which FSS has engaged, threatening them with email blockage if they do not terminate FSS and/oractually blocking emails, via their AHBL blocklist, and then the posting of libelous, filthy, and threatening verbiage in various Newsgroups (Usenet) on the Internet a Google search of BRUNS stalking FSS. BRUNS has continually harassed and threatened FSS and/or its ISPs and accused us, without proof,of spamming, criminal behavior, harassment, filing false police reports, breaching Authorized Use Policies (AUP) and thusly, started his long trail of threats and false accusations culminating with the termination of FSS's account with its ISP,VNDX on or about February 3, 2005. VNDX was told by its providers, Prism and Realinx, that it had been contacted by AHBLwith threats, some verbal by telephonic communication, of blocking its ENTIRE INTERNET PROTOCOL (IP) RANGE, if FSS was not terminated by Prism. BRUNS did eventually block the entire IPrange and VNDX was given an ultimatum by Prism, "Get rid of FSSor VNDX would be shut down." Hence, the termination of our accountby VNDX through Prism (see Exhibit C). VNDX set FSS up on anotherT-1 line through e-spire Communications, Inc., whom BRUNS immediately and subsequently blocked their ENTIRE RANGE for hosting FSS. The FSS web site was ineffective and had continuous problems for approximately thirteen (13) days due to this termination and now lives under the threat of termination, returned emails, ISP problems, etc., due to the continued harassment and stalking by BRUNS, KIRCH, et al. Since the termination of by VNDX, FSS has had to change its hostingand/or collocation service three (3) times. Prior to its present supplier of collocation services, Internet Contrasts, FSS was terminated and/or threatened with termination by Grande Communications and Time Warner Cable respectively. Hence, FSS has been terminated by two (2) other ISPs due to these very same threats. According to Time Warner Cable representatives, Bruns and Kirch had blocked much of its email capabilities for the southern United States. Bruns and Kirch are now blocking our present ISP, Internet Contrasts, entire IP block/range and will no trelease the blockage until our contract/service is cancelled, hence the Injunctive Relief sought in this suit. The block implemented by AHBL affects the mail of all Internet Contrasts' customers even though they have nothing to do with the dispute, i.e., collateral damage.

"San Antonio, Texas Police Report # 05071019, filed January 31, 2005, detailing stalking and harassment by BRUNS and KIRCH and supplementedon or about February 3, 2005, for the termination of the FSS account by Prism and VNDX due to AHBL emails, telephone calls, threats, etc.

"Per the request of Suffolk County, New Jersey Assistant District Attorney, Christopher Nicolino and Suffolk CountyProbation Officer Mrs. Benedetto (BRUNS' probation officer), FSS sent, via facsimile, a copy of the police report for possible probation violations. Mr. Nicolino suggested to further file charges on Mr. Bruns and to secure a warrant in order that he might go back to the original court with proof of probation violations. Detective Padier of the San Antonio Police Department, computer crimes division, is presently coordinating the applicable course of action by SCOVILLE (FSS). There is active police investigation ongoing at the time of filing of this lawsuit.
"Continuous Stalking, Harassing, False Accusations, and Threats by BRUNS, KIRCH, et al to America Online (AOL), Google, and bothpresent and past ISPs of FSS.

"BRUNS and his group have been contacting EVERYONE that FSS does business with to access the Internet to terminate FSS accountsfor a myriad of phony reasons, false accusations, threats, etc. BRUNS and his threats to AOL and Google have gone unheeded due to a lack of substantiative content, even though this form of harassment and stalking has been continuous for years. AHBL, noticeably, does not block the IP ranges of AOL and Google for fear of legal repercussions. These companies are far too large for this group to dictate ultimatums and threats of blackmail and extortion, but the smaller victims, Realinx, Prism,VNDX, and Internet Contrasts do not have the resources to fight such a massive criminal campaign, thus, they must kowtow to the blackmail and extortion threats of blockage, both real and perceived and ultimately FSS suffers severe defamation, economic, and emotional distress. Larger concerns, such as Grande and Time Warner, do not want to deal with the criminal actions of AHBL and simply sever their relationships with FSS and effectivelykowtow to the extortion. As a matter of fact, AHBL's complaints to PRISM are misguided at best. The examples that AHBL cites onits web site originate from AOL and/or Google, not Prism. Note the email address is that of AOL origin and the originating IP is thatof AOL. The speech cited from FSS amounts to nothing more than FREE SPEECH, the truth, and is protected by the First Amendmentof the United States Constitution (Bill of Rights). BRUNS is just irritated because it is about him personally. Again, AOL and Google have deemed AHBL's accusations to be bogus and have notacted on such in any negative manner and FSS continues in goodstanding with both entities and has for years.

Also, these thugshave published and defamed our web site by calling it the"FreeSpeechWhore", "FreeSpeaksWhore", etc. among other disparaging names. This is the modus operandi (MO) of this group of thugs, ex-convicts, and/or felons.

"Blocking Emails Of All Of FSS ISPs, Both Past & Present,Simply For Doing Business With FSS.
"Bruns and Kirch have contacted, harassed, threatened, and extorted each and every Host or Collocation service which FSS has contracted with for services. They then, subsequently, blocked their ENTIREIP ranges, even though their beef was only with FSS. The most egregious was the Time Warner cable blockage of the southern United States. The reasons given for their actions ranged from spamming by FSS, legal threats by FSS, lying by Time Warner, Shoot on Sight (SOS) for threatening AHBL with legal action,to name but a few. Each and every ISP has suffered blocks, threats, and harassment form Bruns and Kirch All were forced to release FSS from its servers because unknowing parties, outside the realm oftheir servers, utilize the AHBL lists thinking that they areprofessionally run and contain credible listings, never knowing that Bruns is a convicted felon for computer crimes and Kirch a hacker. This meant that some of the ISPs customers, other than FSS, were getting mail bounced (returned) because of no fault of thecustomers. This is the "hammer" that AHBL utilizes to threaten ISPs if they do not conform to their wishes. Once the ISP getsrid of the so-called abuser, AHBL unblocks the provider's IP range. FSS has a signed affidavit from another victim of Bruns and Kirch, Barbara Schwarz of Salt Lake City, Utah, which details these Gestapo tactics and shows a pattern of abuse. A San Antonio Police (SAPD)report # 05071019 was filed on January 31, 2005 detailing theharassment from Bruns and Kirch.

"Kirch and/or Bruns hack FSS server and subsequent police reportsfiled and a police investigation initiated.

"On April 22, 2005, the FSS server, the global.asa files, and the ProcLogin.asp files were maliciously changed through hacking byIP address 66.93.203.199. This IP address resolves to Sosdg.orgin Indianapolis, Indiana and is assigned to that entity through Speakeasy.net, per Speakeasy. The chronology of this hackingand years of abuse is described in detail with affidavits. Another San Antonio Police (SAPD) report # 05263973 was filed April 22, 2005. As of the filing of this lawsuit, the investigationis ongoing.

"The ultimate hypocrisy of BRUNS, KIRCH, et al. BRUNS and KIRCHseem to think that threatening legal remedies for continuous abuse, libel, etc. qualifies FSS's IP address to be blocked by AHBL. This form of retribution by the Defendants is incongruent with the right of all Americans to seek their legal remedies. All FSS did was alert the perpetrators ofits intentions of seeking those remedies if the wrongs were not righted. FSS has followed through with its right to sue with the filing of this lawsuit. It was not a threat, but a legal right.
"The Defendants, and each of them, acted together in the above underlying scenario, to cause damages to SCOVILLE. In this connection, BRUNS joined with KIRCH in a conspiracy to defame, disparage, harm, and libel FSS. Because of the joint nature of their course of conduct, and their acting in secret collusion with each other, the Defendants, and each of them, are jointlyand severally liable for the damages caused by each of thecauses of action set forth below."

It is ironic that convicted hacker Brian J. Bruns calls other people abusers while the "AHBL" violates human and civil rights and tries to control freedom of speech on the internet.
References:
http://www.co.suffolk.ny.us/da/press/2002/06_26_02.htm

COMMACK MAN INDICTED FOR HACKING6/26/02
A 21-year-old Commack man has been indicted by a Suffolk CountyGrand Jury on first degree Computer Tampering charges.Brian J. Bruns will be arraigned Thursday, June 27 before Judge Joseph Farneti in Riverhead.

The Suffolk County Police Computer Crime Unit arrested Bruns for disrupting the business operations of his former employer and the firm's clients. The company, Access Highway in Central Islip, fired Bruns on May 17 and soon experienced problems in itsdelivery of Internet and other services to several clients.
Two search warrants were executed at Bruns home at 84 Florida Avenue. Police found pirated computer software and other evidence in the house. The charge of Computer Tampering alleges that Brun intentionally altered computer data essential to the operation of networks systems operated by Access Highway. Brun's alleged hacking damaged Access Highway's operations costing the firm, according to the indictment, over $50,000 in damages.
First degree Computer Tampering is a felony punishable by aprison term of 7 and one-half to 15 years. Brun was also charged with Criminal Mischief in the second degree, a D felony carrying a prison term of 3 and one-half to 7 years.

FREE SPEECH STORE:
Bruns made a "Plea Bargain With The DA" . Only indictment 1577.02 was dismissed and he plead out to a lesser Class E Felony (Crime 156.30) on Indictment 2423-02 and waived his right to appeal as part of the plea. Date of disposition 12/02/2002. Five years probation, no alcohol, narcotics, mandatory surcharge waived, etc., and all acknowledged by DEFENDANT! So, if anyone has proof of probation violations, contact Officer Benedetto at631-852-5084.

Definition of Plea Bargain:
An agreement between a criminal defendant and a prosecutor in which the defendant admits having committed a crime. In return, the prosecutor asks the judge to impose a less severe sentence than had the defendant been convicted at a trial. The judge is not bound by the terms of a plea bargain. A plea bargain ensures that aguilty defendant is punished.http://www.bereamunicourt.org/info.asp

To agree to a guilty plea to a less serious charge in order to havea more serious charge dropped.http://www.nationaltcc.org/tcc/

For more definition of Plea Bargain, seehttp://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&oi=defmore&q=define:Plea+bargain

Computer Trespass:
156.30 Unlawful duplication of computer related material. ...Computer trespass is a class E felony.